Skip to main content

Halloween II (1981): Who Keeps Giving Samuel Loomis Guns?

 




It is a tremendously big ask to follow such a cultural and cinematic landmark as Halloween, especially as the imitators (Prom Night and Friday the 13th had upped the ante the year before) were generating hits and making their own contributions to the tropes of the genre. However, written by Debra Hill and John Carpenter, I think the film stands up pretty well on its own.

The influence of the early slashers the original begat is most clear in that they put a lot more emphasis on creativity of the kills and getting them clearly on camera and making sure they come early and often, away from the more stark to-the-point unstoppable violence of the original. You can argue this takes away from the true horror of the original, and I probably would, but there is also the argument to be made that few people who watch slashers are watching it because they genuinely want to be scared but because they wanna see the kills. There’s a reason the Final Destination movies got away with using the exact same plot 5 times. Much more than the original, this delivers in probably too clever kills, making one wonder how Michael Myers learned how to operate a hospital hot tub or probably insert an IV in which to drain somebody’s blood for no reason. But they are more visceral than the original and much more likely to end up in a YouTube compilation called “GREAT HORROR KILLS PART 4!!!!”

It is a great looking movie. Rick Rosenthal went on to a pretty obscure career as a director, but he clearly had a great eye, scenes are staged well, look attractive, and here and there even add splashes of giallo-like bold colored lights like green and red. He took the style John Carpenter established in the original and did at least a worthy imitation of it, so many of the scenes are quite lovely compositions.

The hospital setting is the real genius of the film. While they certainly take liberties with how dark and quiet a hospital on Halloween night would be, it is worth it for the instantly foreboding atmosphere it gives to the picture. A seemingly half-empty late night hospital with a skeleton crew is a perfect set up to the film, although they do get a little caught up on syringes and scalpels as murder weapons when there’s so much you could use in such a setting. It drives off the natural unease being confined to the hospital brings anybody, and the lingering feeling of death that often reside there.

Of course we get just as much time with Dr. Loomis, and Donald Pleasance is just full on shouting most of the time or giving midnight drunk-sounding monologues about druids and the nature of evil, whatever respectability he had in the first film is full lunacy mode in this film, he almost guns down a teenager in the street and shoots out the window of a cop car. He’s a madman, and every second he is on screen is pure magic. However, this is a really thankless role for Jamie Lee Curtis who barely has any lines for the vast majority of the film, spends half of it in a bed, and the rest of it mostly crawling or limping around barefoot. Gone is the character development of the original, they barely even allow her to flirt back with creepy hospital guy touching her while she was asleep (the chief nurse was right to keep chasing that predator out of the teenage girl’s room). I don’t know who she pissed off, but somebody wasn’t about to let her acting skills flourish in this film even if it actually does make it a much more tense film in effect.

No movie can be the original Halloween, many have followed and none even came close, but while this total rewatch may change my opinion in previous views I’ve always thought this one came the closest and is the platonic ideal of what a Halloween sequel should be. Stylish, fun, just a bit insane, reasonably well written. It is one that I am glad I own a physical copy of (packaged with Halloween III which I am not revisiting for this rewatch, but might pull out in October) I can pull out at any time. It isn’t the original, but it is still clearly one of the most well made slashers of its era.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Cabin in the Woods (2012) - Funny, Fun, and a Little Bit Insufferable

  The late 00s and early 10s were a pretty good time to be somebody who loved cult horror films with a sense of humor. You had the likes of Trick r Treat, Drag Me to Hell, and my favorite at the time which was The Cabin in the Woods. Whether it was on pay cable or early streaming, the film became a regular fixture in the years I mostly just spent my time frequently re-watching the same movies and drinking far too much beer. Because of that, I’ve gone some years without watching it very frequently cause I got kind of burnt out on it in my 20s but I had this former Blockbuster rental Bluray copy that cost less than 2 bucks so I figured why not see how well the film holds up? The thing that hasn’t held up so well is how smugly in love with its own dialog and cleverness the film is in a way that immediately signals that Joss Whedon was a writer on it. There’s a certain too cute quality to a lot of Whedon’s projects that have made me not like them as much as other people do, sorry to ...

The Green Mile (1999) - Syrupy Collection of Great Character Actors

  The Green Mile was a film that was in a regular rotation for my mom and stepdad when I was growing up, so I saw it many times in the late 90s and early 00s. My love of Stephen King mostly comes from my dad, who owned the first King book I ever read myself in late elementary school (Skeleton Crew) and numerous others I looked at on his shelf all the time and showed me miniseries like IT and The Stand. However, my mom contributed a little bit too with the likes of Creepshow and some of his other 80s adaptations and of course The Green Mile. So I figured why not revisit it since I own it? My biggest problem with The Green Mile is one I share with its spiritual sibling in The Shawshank Redemption which is that it is just very sentimental and sometimes even downright corny. Movies seemingly designed to make middle aged dads get in touch with their emotions by layering that syrup on thick. There’s a place for that and I understand why people really enjoy it, but it just simply isn’t ...

Titanic (1997) - A Tale of Two Movies, One Painful and One Great

  The first time I saw Titanic I was just a little kid, and I bawled my eyes out and then once I dried up I begged to see it again so we sat through that extremely long movie twice in two days. Our VHS copy was well worn by the time we upgraded to DVD, we watched it regularly as a family in the late 90s and early 00s. It is probably a quite vital piece of media when it comes to my love and respect and awe of grandiose filmmaking even though these days I maybe only watch it every 5 years or so. So since my parents got Paramount+ through their cable and it was the only film on there that spoke to me when I was first glancing through their library, I figured why not see how it holds up? Honestly, every time I do revisit the film I spend like the first two hours being painfully reminded why it is so rare that I do. I grew up with a mom and older sister, a very female oriented household, so trust me when I say I’ve heard my fair share of really painfully written and delivered romantic ...