Skip to main content

Halloween II (1981): Who Keeps Giving Samuel Loomis Guns?

 




It is a tremendously big ask to follow such a cultural and cinematic landmark as Halloween, especially as the imitators (Prom Night and Friday the 13th had upped the ante the year before) were generating hits and making their own contributions to the tropes of the genre. However, written by Debra Hill and John Carpenter, I think the film stands up pretty well on its own.

The influence of the early slashers the original begat is most clear in that they put a lot more emphasis on creativity of the kills and getting them clearly on camera and making sure they come early and often, away from the more stark to-the-point unstoppable violence of the original. You can argue this takes away from the true horror of the original, and I probably would, but there is also the argument to be made that few people who watch slashers are watching it because they genuinely want to be scared but because they wanna see the kills. There’s a reason the Final Destination movies got away with using the exact same plot 5 times. Much more than the original, this delivers in probably too clever kills, making one wonder how Michael Myers learned how to operate a hospital hot tub or probably insert an IV in which to drain somebody’s blood for no reason. But they are more visceral than the original and much more likely to end up in a YouTube compilation called “GREAT HORROR KILLS PART 4!!!!”

It is a great looking movie. Rick Rosenthal went on to a pretty obscure career as a director, but he clearly had a great eye, scenes are staged well, look attractive, and here and there even add splashes of giallo-like bold colored lights like green and red. He took the style John Carpenter established in the original and did at least a worthy imitation of it, so many of the scenes are quite lovely compositions.

The hospital setting is the real genius of the film. While they certainly take liberties with how dark and quiet a hospital on Halloween night would be, it is worth it for the instantly foreboding atmosphere it gives to the picture. A seemingly half-empty late night hospital with a skeleton crew is a perfect set up to the film, although they do get a little caught up on syringes and scalpels as murder weapons when there’s so much you could use in such a setting. It drives off the natural unease being confined to the hospital brings anybody, and the lingering feeling of death that often reside there.

Of course we get just as much time with Dr. Loomis, and Donald Pleasance is just full on shouting most of the time or giving midnight drunk-sounding monologues about druids and the nature of evil, whatever respectability he had in the first film is full lunacy mode in this film, he almost guns down a teenager in the street and shoots out the window of a cop car. He’s a madman, and every second he is on screen is pure magic. However, this is a really thankless role for Jamie Lee Curtis who barely has any lines for the vast majority of the film, spends half of it in a bed, and the rest of it mostly crawling or limping around barefoot. Gone is the character development of the original, they barely even allow her to flirt back with creepy hospital guy touching her while she was asleep (the chief nurse was right to keep chasing that predator out of the teenage girl’s room). I don’t know who she pissed off, but somebody wasn’t about to let her acting skills flourish in this film even if it actually does make it a much more tense film in effect.

No movie can be the original Halloween, many have followed and none even came close, but while this total rewatch may change my opinion in previous views I’ve always thought this one came the closest and is the platonic ideal of what a Halloween sequel should be. Stylish, fun, just a bit insane, reasonably well written. It is one that I am glad I own a physical copy of (packaged with Halloween III which I am not revisiting for this rewatch, but might pull out in October) I can pull out at any time. It isn’t the original, but it is still clearly one of the most well made slashers of its era.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Green Mile (1999) - Syrupy Collection of Great Character Actors

  The Green Mile was a film that was in a regular rotation for my mom and stepdad when I was growing up, so I saw it many times in the late 90s and early 00s. My love of Stephen King mostly comes from my dad, who owned the first King book I ever read myself in late elementary school (Skeleton Crew) and numerous others I looked at on his shelf all the time and showed me miniseries like IT and The Stand. However, my mom contributed a little bit too with the likes of Creepshow and some of his other 80s adaptations and of course The Green Mile. So I figured why not revisit it since I own it? My biggest problem with The Green Mile is one I share with its spiritual sibling in The Shawshank Redemption which is that it is just very sentimental and sometimes even downright corny. Movies seemingly designed to make middle aged dads get in touch with their emotions by layering that syrup on thick. There’s a place for that and I understand why people really enjoy it, but it just simply isn’t ...

Cat's Eye (1985) - Kitty Across America

  There are two important facts about me, two important obsessions that haunt me: a love of anthology series and a love of Stephen King adaptations of all shapes and colors. As sometimes I imply on here, I’m a regular collector of physical media from VHS and Laserdiscs to DVDs and Blurays, and a big bulk of my DVD and Bluray collection are horror or other genre anthology TV series and you better bet I own physical copies of a number of anthology films too including both closely associated with King (as part of the same $20 box set): Creepshow and Cat’s Eye. One day I will formally write a review of Creepshow but I’ll spoil my feelings about it by saying it is absolutely one of my favorite horror films of all time to the point that it is almost certainly in my top 20, maybe top 10 favorite films of all time. So the first time I watched Cat’s Eye, which I believe was maybe pre-Covid, I had one of my favorite films ever made to compare it to and it sagged in my estimation as a result...

M (1931) - Even Better than Peter Lorre's Haunting Eyes

  Anybody who knows me knows my biggest vice in life is true crime as guilty and gross as I feel about it quite frequently, and unfortunately as a true crime junkie you end up hearing about a lot of cases involving abused or dead children. So of course I joked to my main group chat of friends when I decided to watch M the other day that I needed to take a break from all the stories about dead kids I’d watched that day so I was going to put on a movie about a serial child murderer. To be honest this might be kind of a short review compared to some I’ve written, because I don’t have that much negative to say. Some of the performances seem a little “big”, but so soon after the silent era that is to be expected and that is just kinda of body language analysis since I do not speak German at all. Also it does something that a lot of films of its era does, which I’m guessing had something to do with cameras speeds at that time, where instead of showcasing people naturally running it inst...