Skip to main content

Saw (2004): Revolutionary Torture Smut

 


I was a fan of the first 2 or 3 Saw films when they came out, as a nearly lifelong horror fan who was excited about whatever slasher-related content I could get after the post-Scream boom started to dry up in the 2000s. A 13 year old who spent much of his time consuming an endless stream of music videos is exactly the target audience for this first film. However, it has been many years since I last watched it in full, so I was genuinely curious as to how I’d look at it in my 30s.

Right off the bat, let’s get to the “music video” thing. Every flashback kill and some just normal procedural action is done in this hyper, quickcut editing style that just screams late 90s and early 00s hard and alternative rock music videos, and it is truly appalling. It has aged like raw milk, and it honestly makes the chief appeal of this franchise in their creative kills downright hard to watch let alone enjoy, a total cringefest but far from in the torture porn way they intended.

However, removing myself from the knowledge of what a cliché so much would become as much as I can and just enjoying the film for what it is, it is still pretty good. The intimate, small, horrifying setting our two main characters find themselves in remains incredibly effective at maintaining a crampt, gross out atmosphere. Both actors are perfectly fine, though writer Leigh Whannell probably comes off the better of the two. The sequences are also well directed, keeping things kinetic with a frequently moving handheld to best utilize the small space and action limited by literal chains. It heightens the paranoia and claustrophobia more and more as the film goes on, and it is not surprising that James Wan would become a renowned genre director.

The police scenes are also perfectly fine with Danny Glover being everybody’s platonic ideal of what a police detective should be in countless movies in his career and doing an effective job setting up the kills and giving a fun little action sequence that is a highlight of the film and setting up the deep lore of the series which if you can’t enjoy the kills a great deal due to the editing is a huge part of the appeal. A touch of noir and a touch of hack philosophy go a long way in making this quite unlike most horror films that’d come out by that era.

All the fine threads start weaving together in the climax even if it feels like it takes a bit to get there and some are pretty telegraphed from early on, and despite literally the worst car chase sequences I have ever seen in my life it is full of two different fronts of action keeping you guessing and the heart pounding and most of it is really well done and even the most famous part is more suggestion than gore but perfectly acted and timed and absolutely brutal and bleak.

It is far from a perfect film, but you can really see what a revolutionary thing it was at the time, doing something with a structure and mindset that wasn’t widely seen in the mainstream at that time though they repeat the formula countless times with various twists. I can still really enjoy it for an effective horror movie some 20 years later.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Saw II (2005): Anybody Else's Needle Phobia Got Them Itchy?

  Finally getting around to watching Saw II as part of my complete series rewatch after a few weeks since the first, this time watched on the Roku Channel instead of my beat up DVDs because it is a marginally crisper picture and I cannot do a disservice to the cinematographer, of course. Oddly enough I believe that this is the Saw film that I have seen the most times in my life, just because it’d sometimes pop up on random streamers or back in the day cable movie channels. As often with these reviews, we’ll get to the bad first. The cast is a huge downgrade, no offense to Beverley Mitchell who I loved as a kid who sometimes watched 7 th Heaven with my older sister, from the original with none of the victims being nearly as compelling as the two originals and Donnie Wahlberg’s one-note performance being a huge downgrade from in terms of nuance from Danny Glover in the lead detective role. The nu metal music video editing isn’t quite as intense as the original, but unfortunately it is

Halloween (1978): An All Around Treat Good for the Whole Family

Like, nobody really needs me to tell them that Halloween is good. We all know it is probably the greatest slasher and one of the best horror films of at least the 70s if not all time. If you are expecting I’m gonna rip this movie to shreds, that’s not the case, I’m not gonna be contrary for the sake of it. It is totally awesome from start to finish even if AMC+ did something unnatural to this version I watched to desaturate it so much it looks like Zack Snyder directed it. But why is it so great? I can think of a few reasons. Well, of course, the iconic POV opening. Far from the first film to use killer POV, Halloween’s direct inspiration in the fun Black Christmas used it extensively as did many films in the giallo genre over in Italy that were more of an influence on early slashers than anything. But it is perfectly executed, it is just long enough for you to get the point and sneak in a little nudity in the opening minutes and establish most of what you need to establish. It is one

Poltergeist (1982) - The Reason I Keep No Clown Memorabilia in My House

  I’m always torn, if it isn’t part of one of my specific watch projects, as to whether or not I should review films that are considered all time classics if all I’m gonna say is “Yep, I love it as much as you do” but I also think that my very limited audience for these blog posts might appreciate if I’m not just always writing about B and C grade slashers or TV movies. So since I recently picked up a beat up, but still very playable, DVD copy of the entire Poltergeist trilogy, yesterday I decided to sit down and revisit the original for the first time in a few years. As the first paragraph heavily implies, I still really, really love this movie. I often start my reviews with what I didn’t like first so that I can end on a more positive note even when the film doesn’t deserve it, but the list is very, very short here. Some of special effects have aged pretty poorly, such as the “face” scene, and it is a little uncomfortable how much effort they put in for gratuitous underwear shots