Skip to main content

Saw II (2005): Anybody Else's Needle Phobia Got Them Itchy?

 



Finally getting around to watching Saw II as part of my complete series rewatch after a few weeks since the first, this time watched on the Roku Channel instead of my beat up DVDs because it is a marginally crisper picture and I cannot do a disservice to the cinematographer, of course. Oddly enough I believe that this is the Saw film that I have seen the most times in my life, just because it’d sometimes pop up on random streamers or back in the day cable movie channels.

As often with these reviews, we’ll get to the bad first. The cast is a huge downgrade, no offense to Beverley Mitchell who I loved as a kid who sometimes watched 7th Heaven with my older sister, from the original with none of the victims being nearly as compelling as the two originals and Donnie Wahlberg’s one-note performance being a huge downgrade from in terms of nuance from Danny Glover in the lead detective role. The nu metal music video editing isn’t quite as intense as the original, but unfortunately it is used more often having seeped away from just flashbacks into like just two people talking across a desk from each other in real time and the like. While the abandoned house certainly lives up to the grimy expectations of the series, the direction is much more flat and a lot less interesting any given point compared to James Wan’s work on the original.

However, there is stuff to like about this movie. After so much just being in single room in the original, the house seems downright expansive in comparison. Getting to see a bunch of people reacting to the situation as a group is an interesting twist and seeing a number of different simple very effective traps in “real time” is a big improvement on the slasher-y side of the Saw franchise. The furnace, the needle pit, the razor cuffs, these traps are solid and creative. The series lore gets some solid additions, and you cannot have Saw without the pseudo philosophical lore.

Tobin Bell getting significantly more screentime is a huge benefit to the series, he’s pitch perfect in the role and such a huge reason why the series was able to continue for so long. While obviously he was primarily chosen because he had such an amazing voice for a tape recorder-based performance in the original, he has such a distinct look and delivery that was just instantly iconic in the world of horror baddies.

The goal for sequels is to be bigger and better than the original, and this one gets like 3/4s there. It is certainly bigger in every way except for star power, and there are certainly things about its formula that originate here rather than the first film, some of which were a clear improvement even if they will later be done to death. However, it is not as good an overall film, but it isn’t a whole lot worse, it is totally watchable and enjoyable. I would recommend it to anybody who enjoyed the OG.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Green Mile (1999) - Syrupy Collection of Great Character Actors

  The Green Mile was a film that was in a regular rotation for my mom and stepdad when I was growing up, so I saw it many times in the late 90s and early 00s. My love of Stephen King mostly comes from my dad, who owned the first King book I ever read myself in late elementary school (Skeleton Crew) and numerous others I looked at on his shelf all the time and showed me miniseries like IT and The Stand. However, my mom contributed a little bit too with the likes of Creepshow and some of his other 80s adaptations and of course The Green Mile. So I figured why not revisit it since I own it? My biggest problem with The Green Mile is one I share with its spiritual sibling in The Shawshank Redemption which is that it is just very sentimental and sometimes even downright corny. Movies seemingly designed to make middle aged dads get in touch with their emotions by layering that syrup on thick. There’s a place for that and I understand why people really enjoy it, but it just simply isn’t ...

Cat's Eye (1985) - Kitty Across America

  There are two important facts about me, two important obsessions that haunt me: a love of anthology series and a love of Stephen King adaptations of all shapes and colors. As sometimes I imply on here, I’m a regular collector of physical media from VHS and Laserdiscs to DVDs and Blurays, and a big bulk of my DVD and Bluray collection are horror or other genre anthology TV series and you better bet I own physical copies of a number of anthology films too including both closely associated with King (as part of the same $20 box set): Creepshow and Cat’s Eye. One day I will formally write a review of Creepshow but I’ll spoil my feelings about it by saying it is absolutely one of my favorite horror films of all time to the point that it is almost certainly in my top 20, maybe top 10 favorite films of all time. So the first time I watched Cat’s Eye, which I believe was maybe pre-Covid, I had one of my favorite films ever made to compare it to and it sagged in my estimation as a result...

Scream (1996) - Williamson Dialogue Hasn't Always Aged Well, Though Iconic All the Same

  My mom grew up among the slasher golden era of the 80s, so she adored the genre and many of the 2000+ VHS tapes she had around for a lot of my childhood were various slasher franchises and what we didn’t have by 7 or 8 I was begging my parents to rent for me from Hollywood Video or Movie Starz on a regular basis. So it goes without saying that Scream coming in and revitalizing the entire genre’s popularity for a handful of years was a big deal in our household and I was probably very young the first time I saw it which was likely not long after it came out on tape in probably ‘97, same with the sequels in later years. I then proceeded to watch it so many times across my childhood well into adulthood that practically every line and scene and even delivery are memorized at that point, which made stepping back to write as objective a review as I can somewhat difficult but I found the more of a critical eye I applied to it the more it worked out. As always starting with the negat...