Skip to main content

Masters of the Universe (1987) - Cannon...Makes a Pretty Decent Film?

 



Last year I bought a used copy of a DVD box set called The Bombs, Babes & Blockbusters of Cannon Films because I am totally fascinated by the story and products of Golan and Globus which gets told well in an excellent documentary (Electric Boogaloo: The Wild, Untold Story of Cannon Films) included in the set. However, other than said documentary, it has just sat on my shelf untouched and unwatched for months so I thought what a better way than to break out of the horror realm for this blog briefly. So I decided to watch Masters of the Universe as the only one on the collection that could be described as having a genuine cult following.

There are definitely issues. The Skeletor mask looks hilariously awful, like a bad Spirit Halloween costume, and it has a common problem with any of the facial prosthetics used in the film which is that they could not figure out how to keep the mouth moving looking weird and fake. None of the protagonists except Billy Barty as the purposefully hideous Gwildor give a particularly good performance, not even a young Courtney Cox or the man who’d go on to be Tom Paris on Star Trek: Voyager, with the Masters woodenly working their way through chunky dialog and the teens being broad and cartoonish. The movie takes the road that so many B sci-fi and fantasy films in the 80s do, which is cheap out after building one decent set and arrange for the plot to allow them to just shoot at various locations in a normal Earth town for which they don’t have to do any real design work. Finally, a lot of the action is clumsy and not particularly well coordinated or shot in a clear manner, however you can say this is just the house Cannon style.

I was surprised however how much of the film I genuinely enjoyed. First off, Frank Langella despite that stuff glued poorly to his face gives a really fun, scenery devouring, Shakespearean performance as Skeletor that makes you sad every moment he’s not on screen he so completely steals every scene he is in, and I also really enjoyed the performance by James Talkan as a put upon cop just trying to make sense of what is going on around him. Some of the makeup and design of Skeletor’s various beastie bounty hunters is really solid as long as they aren’t asked to move their mouths on camera. A lot of the scenes at night have really interesting use of lighting that is one of the biggest of the director’s cited Jack Kirby influence on the film, though the comic book approach is abundantly clear frequently which I can really appreciate and I’d mostly call Gary Goddard successful in that pursuit. The SFX work for the portals and lightning/energy effects all look really, really good for a fairly low budget 80s film. It moves at a pretty brisk pace and rarely has much dull lag which is the case of so many 80s genre films of its era that give you like 30 minutes of action and 60 of walking around the woods.

The film is cheesy and pretty low rent for such a beloved property of children of a certain time, but I absolutely understand now why it has the cult following that it does because I found myself genuinely entertained either for the right or the wrong reasons, but more for the former than the latter, pretty much from start to finish. This is a DVD in my collection I definitely see myself picking up and throwing in from time to time in the future.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ivan the Terrible, Part 1 (1944) - Uncomfortably Stalinist, Visually Astounding

  I know that I usually start reviews with a personal anecdote of some sort, but this one is kind of a head scratcher. My only real ties in my life to the Soviet Union are just a lifelong, morbid fascination with the Cold War era and rocking a hammer and sickle pin on my backpack as middle schooler into punk rock. However, I do like a lot of Soviet era cartoons which are a special kind of surreal and I really like some film movements of Soviet states on the fringe, and what Soviet films I’ve seen often have very strong and striking visuals. So when I saw that Ivan the Terrible Parts 1 and 2 were on Max, I couldn’t turn down the opportunity to do something different for this blog even if it might be a bit shorter than my typical review. Obviously, the biggest and most valid criticism of the film is how deeply unsubtle it is in most ways, but particularly when it comes to defending and propagating the ideals of Stalinism. As a member of the left, I’m well aware there are factions t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Scream (1996) - Williamson Dialogue Hasn't Always Aged Well, Though Iconic All the Same

  My mom grew up among the slasher golden era of the 80s, so she adored the genre and many of the 2000+ VHS tapes she had around for a lot of my childhood were various slasher franchises and what we didn’t have by 7 or 8 I was begging my parents to rent for me from Hollywood Video or Movie Starz on a regular basis. So it goes without saying that Scream coming in and revitalizing the entire genre’s popularity for a handful of years was a big deal in our household and I was probably very young the first time I saw it which was likely not long after it came out on tape in probably ‘97, same with the sequels in later years. I then proceeded to watch it so many times across my childhood well into adulthood that practically every line and scene and even delivery are memorized at that point, which made stepping back to write as objective a review as I can somewhat difficult but I found the more of a critical eye I applied to it the more it worked out. As always starting with the negat...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Cabin in the Woods (2012) - Funny, Fun, and a Little Bit Insufferable

  The late 00s and early 10s were a pretty good time to be somebody who loved cult horror films with a sense of humor. You had the likes of Trick r Treat, Drag Me to Hell, and my favorite at the time which was The Cabin in the Woods. Whether it was on pay cable or early streaming, the film became a regular fixture in the years I mostly just spent my time frequently re-watching the same movies and drinking far too much beer. Because of that, I’ve gone some years without watching it very frequently cause I got kind of burnt out on it in my 20s but I had this former Blockbuster rental Bluray copy that cost less than 2 bucks so I figured why not see how well the film holds up? The thing that hasn’t held up so well is how smugly in love with its own dialog and cleverness the film is in a way that immediately signals that Joss Whedon was a writer on it. There’s a certain too cute quality to a lot of Whedon’s projects that have made me not like them as much as other people do, sorry to ...
Post a Comment
Read more