Skip to main content

Masters of the Universe (1987) - Cannon...Makes a Pretty Decent Film?

 



Last year I bought a used copy of a DVD box set called The Bombs, Babes & Blockbusters of Cannon Films because I am totally fascinated by the story and products of Golan and Globus which gets told well in an excellent documentary (Electric Boogaloo: The Wild, Untold Story of Cannon Films) included in the set. However, other than said documentary, it has just sat on my shelf untouched and unwatched for months so I thought what a better way than to break out of the horror realm for this blog briefly. So I decided to watch Masters of the Universe as the only one on the collection that could be described as having a genuine cult following.

There are definitely issues. The Skeletor mask looks hilariously awful, like a bad Spirit Halloween costume, and it has a common problem with any of the facial prosthetics used in the film which is that they could not figure out how to keep the mouth moving looking weird and fake. None of the protagonists except Billy Barty as the purposefully hideous Gwildor give a particularly good performance, not even a young Courtney Cox or the man who’d go on to be Tom Paris on Star Trek: Voyager, with the Masters woodenly working their way through chunky dialog and the teens being broad and cartoonish. The movie takes the road that so many B sci-fi and fantasy films in the 80s do, which is cheap out after building one decent set and arrange for the plot to allow them to just shoot at various locations in a normal Earth town for which they don’t have to do any real design work. Finally, a lot of the action is clumsy and not particularly well coordinated or shot in a clear manner, however you can say this is just the house Cannon style.

I was surprised however how much of the film I genuinely enjoyed. First off, Frank Langella despite that stuff glued poorly to his face gives a really fun, scenery devouring, Shakespearean performance as Skeletor that makes you sad every moment he’s not on screen he so completely steals every scene he is in, and I also really enjoyed the performance by James Talkan as a put upon cop just trying to make sense of what is going on around him. Some of the makeup and design of Skeletor’s various beastie bounty hunters is really solid as long as they aren’t asked to move their mouths on camera. A lot of the scenes at night have really interesting use of lighting that is one of the biggest of the director’s cited Jack Kirby influence on the film, though the comic book approach is abundantly clear frequently which I can really appreciate and I’d mostly call Gary Goddard successful in that pursuit. The SFX work for the portals and lightning/energy effects all look really, really good for a fairly low budget 80s film. It moves at a pretty brisk pace and rarely has much dull lag which is the case of so many 80s genre films of its era that give you like 30 minutes of action and 60 of walking around the woods.

The film is cheesy and pretty low rent for such a beloved property of children of a certain time, but I absolutely understand now why it has the cult following that it does because I found myself genuinely entertained either for the right or the wrong reasons, but more for the former than the latter, pretty much from start to finish. This is a DVD in my collection I definitely see myself picking up and throwing in from time to time in the future.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Cabin in the Woods (2012) - Funny, Fun, and a Little Bit Insufferable

  The late 00s and early 10s were a pretty good time to be somebody who loved cult horror films with a sense of humor. You had the likes of Trick r Treat, Drag Me to Hell, and my favorite at the time which was The Cabin in the Woods. Whether it was on pay cable or early streaming, the film became a regular fixture in the years I mostly just spent my time frequently re-watching the same movies and drinking far too much beer. Because of that, I’ve gone some years without watching it very frequently cause I got kind of burnt out on it in my 20s but I had this former Blockbuster rental Bluray copy that cost less than 2 bucks so I figured why not see how well the film holds up? The thing that hasn’t held up so well is how smugly in love with its own dialog and cleverness the film is in a way that immediately signals that Joss Whedon was a writer on it. There’s a certain too cute quality to a lot of Whedon’s projects that have made me not like them as much as other people do, sorry to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Green Mile (1999) - Syrupy Collection of Great Character Actors

  The Green Mile was a film that was in a regular rotation for my mom and stepdad when I was growing up, so I saw it many times in the late 90s and early 00s. My love of Stephen King mostly comes from my dad, who owned the first King book I ever read myself in late elementary school (Skeleton Crew) and numerous others I looked at on his shelf all the time and showed me miniseries like IT and The Stand. However, my mom contributed a little bit too with the likes of Creepshow and some of his other 80s adaptations and of course The Green Mile. So I figured why not revisit it since I own it? My biggest problem with The Green Mile is one I share with its spiritual sibling in The Shawshank Redemption which is that it is just very sentimental and sometimes even downright corny. Movies seemingly designed to make middle aged dads get in touch with their emotions by layering that syrup on thick. There’s a place for that and I understand why people really enjoy it, but it just simply isn’t ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Titanic (1997) - A Tale of Two Movies, One Painful and One Great

  The first time I saw Titanic I was just a little kid, and I bawled my eyes out and then once I dried up I begged to see it again so we sat through that extremely long movie twice in two days. Our VHS copy was well worn by the time we upgraded to DVD, we watched it regularly as a family in the late 90s and early 00s. It is probably a quite vital piece of media when it comes to my love and respect and awe of grandiose filmmaking even though these days I maybe only watch it every 5 years or so. So since my parents got Paramount+ through their cable and it was the only film on there that spoke to me when I was first glancing through their library, I figured why not see how it holds up? Honestly, every time I do revisit the film I spend like the first two hours being painfully reminded why it is so rare that I do. I grew up with a mom and older sister, a very female oriented household, so trust me when I say I’ve heard my fair share of really painfully written and delivered romantic ...
Post a Comment
Read more