Skip to main content

Phantoms (1998) - C'mon Guys, Stop Kicking Dean Koontz, He's Already Dead

 


A fair amount of my life just via being a pop culture junkie I’ve made many jokes at Dean Koontz’s expense suggesting he is the poor man’s Stephen King or “The K Mart Stephen King”. Recently though, I realized how unfair this was when I had never even read a Koontz book, so I sought out to find one that sounded interesting on audiobook and settled on Phantoms because I am obviously a genre film nerd and knew very well that they had adapted it into a film when I was a kid and could thus compare the two down the line. To my mild surprise, I did generally enjoy the book, I wouldn’t call it great or anything but it was a pretty solid chunk of somewhat Lovecraftian storytelling that was pretty engaging at most times. However, this is not the kind of review that compares the book to the film, I want to judge the film on its own merits and thus will try to limit how often I refer back to the book for some reason.

There are definitely flaws here. Despite being, on paper, the lead of the film and a medical doctor Joanna Going after the first like 20 minutes isn’t really given much of anything to do on screen except look concerned and react to Ben Affleck, which in breaking my rule just once I will say was not a problem with the character that came from the novel. Rose McGowan is consistently really terrible and part-wooden but also part-cartoony playing a character who is implied to be considerably younger than she actually was at the time, which is partially just because the character was just really badly written as stereotypical bratty, sarcastic teen but the performance does not elevate anything which is surprising coming two years after Scream and 1 before Jawbreaker: she knew how to act in better movies. Peter O’Toole does the absolute best with what he is given so maybe it should not go in this section of the review as I enjoyed him, but they don’t give him a lot of time to do the grand monologues of ancient evils that you’re expect from such a character and instead he’s just treated as source of short bursts of exposition whenever they need it, never making quite clear what his real scientific specialties or qualifications are so they can use him for whatever they want.

Likewise, the execution here isn’t always great. You get the feeling early on that the primary reason this film was chosen for adaptation is because you could save so much money on SFX if you are being taunted by an unseen enemy most of the film. While the practical FX doesn’t look bad, it is VERY sparingly used outside of very inexpensive black goop and often shrouded in shadow or quick edits or in one notable case being at the other side of a window, and the few times they actually seem to use some digital effects similarly get little actual time on screen although against just streetlamp lighting they look fine. The pacing is not great, with the first half of the film feeling very slow and just generally spooky as they walk around an empty (except corpses) town rather than ever really scary, and so little time is spent towards the end of the film figuring out the grand evil and how to maybe defeat it that it seems far too sudden and convenient and just pure plot contrivance.

However, I would absolutely classify the film as watchable. While never flashy, the whole film is very steadily directed with strong atmosphere and a good eye for framing shots by Joe Chappelle who along with many network procedurals is probably best known to fellow nerds as being a director of many great episodes of The Wire where he was also an exec producer, so despite his lack of success as a film director he knows what he’s doing. It looks pretty good consistently.

As the male lead, Ben Affleck absolutely exudes leadership under pressure and a common man’s approach to discovering the unknown, even if I wouldn’t call it one of his more interesting performances of his young career where at times he was much better. Liev Schreiber however absolutely steals the show as a creepy deputy cop in big glasses who starts losing his marbles not long after being introduced into the situation in a performance that is fairly subtle and focused on body language and facial expressions frequently despite the character having not much subtly at all in the writing. I have said it before and I will say it again: there has never been a film that has not been improved by having Liev Schreiber in the cast.

Did I enjoy the book more than the film? Absolutely, 100%. Do I totally understand why so many critics at the time thought the story translated poorly to film? Definitely. However, if you divorce yourself from its source material and just take it in as a late 90s horror film with up and coming actors (and one legend), can you have a fun, pulpy evening watching with it? Sure ya can, I’d probably watch it again even if maybe not for a long time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ivan the Terrible, Part 1 (1944) - Uncomfortably Stalinist, Visually Astounding

  I know that I usually start reviews with a personal anecdote of some sort, but this one is kind of a head scratcher. My only real ties in my life to the Soviet Union are just a lifelong, morbid fascination with the Cold War era and rocking a hammer and sickle pin on my backpack as middle schooler into punk rock. However, I do like a lot of Soviet era cartoons which are a special kind of surreal and I really like some film movements of Soviet states on the fringe, and what Soviet films I’ve seen often have very strong and striking visuals. So when I saw that Ivan the Terrible Parts 1 and 2 were on Max, I couldn’t turn down the opportunity to do something different for this blog even if it might be a bit shorter than my typical review. Obviously, the biggest and most valid criticism of the film is how deeply unsubtle it is in most ways, but particularly when it comes to defending and propagating the ideals of Stalinism. As a member of the left, I’m well aware there are factions t...

Scream (1996) - Williamson Dialogue Hasn't Always Aged Well, Though Iconic All the Same

  My mom grew up among the slasher golden era of the 80s, so she adored the genre and many of the 2000+ VHS tapes she had around for a lot of my childhood were various slasher franchises and what we didn’t have by 7 or 8 I was begging my parents to rent for me from Hollywood Video or Movie Starz on a regular basis. So it goes without saying that Scream coming in and revitalizing the entire genre’s popularity for a handful of years was a big deal in our household and I was probably very young the first time I saw it which was likely not long after it came out on tape in probably ‘97, same with the sequels in later years. I then proceeded to watch it so many times across my childhood well into adulthood that practically every line and scene and even delivery are memorized at that point, which made stepping back to write as objective a review as I can somewhat difficult but I found the more of a critical eye I applied to it the more it worked out. As always starting with the negat...

The Cabin in the Woods (2012) - Funny, Fun, and a Little Bit Insufferable

  The late 00s and early 10s were a pretty good time to be somebody who loved cult horror films with a sense of humor. You had the likes of Trick r Treat, Drag Me to Hell, and my favorite at the time which was The Cabin in the Woods. Whether it was on pay cable or early streaming, the film became a regular fixture in the years I mostly just spent my time frequently re-watching the same movies and drinking far too much beer. Because of that, I’ve gone some years without watching it very frequently cause I got kind of burnt out on it in my 20s but I had this former Blockbuster rental Bluray copy that cost less than 2 bucks so I figured why not see how well the film holds up? The thing that hasn’t held up so well is how smugly in love with its own dialog and cleverness the film is in a way that immediately signals that Joss Whedon was a writer on it. There’s a certain too cute quality to a lot of Whedon’s projects that have made me not like them as much as other people do, sorry to ...