Skip to main content

Dagon (2001) - A Film So Damp YOU Will Want a Towel Handy

 


When I was younger, I spent a lot of my time perusing lists of “cult films” to check out, paying special attention to anything horror-related which is my happy place as anybody who has read most of the entries in this blog could probably guess. This is how I first became acquainted with Stuart Gordon and his Lovecraft adaptations with Jeffrey Combs and Barbara Crampton, Re-Animator and From Beyond, which instantly became all time favorite films of mine upon the very first viewing. For many years I was just happy with those two films, but in recent years every now and then I’ve been known to throw on one of the lower-budget productions Gordon has done which have always been entirely competently made even if there are highs and lows, but this is my first time watching this much later entry into his Lovecraft cycle.

There are some signs that this didn’t have quite the backing his earlier Lovecraft films did. The lead actor doesn’t even have a Wikipedia page, and he never quite sells having charisma early in the film or being horrified by unspeakable terrors in the middle or being a badass survivor towards the end. He’s just kind of a flat, generic actor of which you can find in any lower budget horror film over the decades although that can sometimes have its benefits to making his fight scenes seem more realistic and purposefully clumsy. The use of CGI is just straight horrible even for the early 2000s, most of the “underwater” scenes utilize it and they look barely better than a PS2 cutscene of the era and its heavy use in the early parts of the film can legitimately be an obstacle to getting into the film along with the not particularly well written or engaging dialogue between the lead and his girlfriend in the opening 20 minutes. Which doesn’t necessarily abate, you will not find many clever lines although that fact is smartly obscured by the fact that English isn’t the first language for many actors, quite a lot of lines are in Spanish or fish-people language, and most of the exposition is dropped in purposefully broken English.

One thing you cannot say though is that Stuart Gordon doesn’t know how to direct and design a damn effective horror film. The endless and oppressive rain, the sets that even indoors all give the appearance of being moldy and damp and either disused or used too much, the claustrophobic trap design of the town. The camera is fluid through endless medium-slow pursuit throughout much of the film and shows that Gordon remained a pro at doing what he does best. The makeup and prosthetic work on all the residents of the town is fantastic even if mostly shown at a glance more often than not, and really provide the otherworldly air to the whole proceeding and make it feel like a genuinely scary and alien situation for anybody which is only heightened by relocating the film from New England to Spain to which they establish the lead character has only the slightest of links. They pick and choose when to utilize gore in the film so it isn’t super frequent, but it is exceptionally effective when they do including one very explicit scene that seems to go on for 5 squeamish minutes (saying this as a good thing) when in reality it is a fraction of that. I also thought that Raquel Meroño was a perfectly solid scream queen who really could have used with more screen time throughout the course of the film.

Even when we are talking straight-to-VHS territory (shoutout to the super underrated Castle Freak he did with Full Moon Features in the mid 90s), Stuart Gordon almost always turns in a film that hits all the fundamentals of solid directing and makes the best use of what limited resources he has available to him. I remember RedLetterMedia once called a film by him that snuck onto their roster which I believe was the okay Robot Jox as being “too good to be on Best of the Worst”. This is one of those cases. He seems to put every cent into effectively building the most bleak, decayed, disgusting, moist environment which he possibly can and it works entirely. You cannot help but start to feel more and more vicariously uncomfortable the longer you watch, physically as well as in terms of creep factor. Also we cannot forget how furious noted racist HP Lovecraft would likely be if he knew he’d been adapted by primarily Spanish speaking actors, so that is of course an attribute as well.

It probably won’t blow you away or change your perception of on-screen horror like early Gordon films did me as a teenanger/young adult, but what do I love to promote more than a solid, engaging B-film?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Green Mile (1999) - Syrupy Collection of Great Character Actors

  The Green Mile was a film that was in a regular rotation for my mom and stepdad when I was growing up, so I saw it many times in the late 90s and early 00s. My love of Stephen King mostly comes from my dad, who owned the first King book I ever read myself in late elementary school (Skeleton Crew) and numerous others I looked at on his shelf all the time and showed me miniseries like IT and The Stand. However, my mom contributed a little bit too with the likes of Creepshow and some of his other 80s adaptations and of course The Green Mile. So I figured why not revisit it since I own it? My biggest problem with The Green Mile is one I share with its spiritual sibling in The Shawshank Redemption which is that it is just very sentimental and sometimes even downright corny. Movies seemingly designed to make middle aged dads get in touch with their emotions by layering that syrup on thick. There’s a place for that and I understand why people really enjoy it, but it just simply isn’t ...

The Cabin in the Woods (2012) - Funny, Fun, and a Little Bit Insufferable

  The late 00s and early 10s were a pretty good time to be somebody who loved cult horror films with a sense of humor. You had the likes of Trick r Treat, Drag Me to Hell, and my favorite at the time which was The Cabin in the Woods. Whether it was on pay cable or early streaming, the film became a regular fixture in the years I mostly just spent my time frequently re-watching the same movies and drinking far too much beer. Because of that, I’ve gone some years without watching it very frequently cause I got kind of burnt out on it in my 20s but I had this former Blockbuster rental Bluray copy that cost less than 2 bucks so I figured why not see how well the film holds up? The thing that hasn’t held up so well is how smugly in love with its own dialog and cleverness the film is in a way that immediately signals that Joss Whedon was a writer on it. There’s a certain too cute quality to a lot of Whedon’s projects that have made me not like them as much as other people do, sorry to ...

Titanic (1997) - A Tale of Two Movies, One Painful and One Great

  The first time I saw Titanic I was just a little kid, and I bawled my eyes out and then once I dried up I begged to see it again so we sat through that extremely long movie twice in two days. Our VHS copy was well worn by the time we upgraded to DVD, we watched it regularly as a family in the late 90s and early 00s. It is probably a quite vital piece of media when it comes to my love and respect and awe of grandiose filmmaking even though these days I maybe only watch it every 5 years or so. So since my parents got Paramount+ through their cable and it was the only film on there that spoke to me when I was first glancing through their library, I figured why not see how it holds up? Honestly, every time I do revisit the film I spend like the first two hours being painfully reminded why it is so rare that I do. I grew up with a mom and older sister, a very female oriented household, so trust me when I say I’ve heard my fair share of really painfully written and delivered romantic ...